Monday, August 15, 2022
  • Login
CEO North America
  • Home
  • Business
    • Entrepreneur
    • Industry
    • Innovation
    • Management & Leadership
  • CEO Interviews
  • CEO Life
    • Art & Culture
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel
    • Environment
  • Opinion
  • News
  • Multimedia
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Business
    • Entrepreneur
    • Industry
    • Innovation
    • Management & Leadership
  • CEO Interviews
  • CEO Life
    • Art & Culture
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel
    • Environment
  • Opinion
  • News
  • Multimedia
No Result
View All Result
CEO North America
No Result
View All Result

How can net zero in chemicals be profitable?

in Industry
How can net zero in chemicals be profitable?
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The transition to a net-zero-carbon future may be one of the biggest challenges to ever face human society.

Perhaps that is why less than 40% of US-headquartered chemical companies in the ICIS Top 100 have published net-zero climate goals or climate goals aligned with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). The initiative now counts over 1,000 companies worldwide that are setting emissions reduction targets grounded in the science and actions necessary to limit global temperature rise to below 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. Buy-in lags in the US despite demonstrations across industry sectors that these targets boost profitability, improve investor confidence, drive innovation, reduce regulatory uncertainty and strengthen brand reputation. 

Decarbonization is particularly challenging for the chemicals sector, which sits at the center of the connections between the products that people use in everyday life and the raw materials used to manufacture them. The most carbon-intensive sectors (such as oil and gas and power and utilities) have faced shareholder pressure regarding climate change for years, and chemicals now face more of the same scrutiny. Most of the largest companies have enhanced climate disclosures and conducted scenario analyses following the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations.

In the past year, many leading companies have set net-zero or other decarbonization ambitions. The financial sector is showing greater awareness of the systemic risk of destabilization that climate change presents, calling on companies to lead and considering the changes that will be necessary at a portfolio level to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050 or sooner as a society. Pressure continues to accelerate on all industries to decarbonize, especially those that are carbon intensive or highly consumer-facing. This pressure is also increasing in the US, intensified by the Biden administration’s emphasis on climate.

Renewable energy is increasingly cheaper than fossil fuel energy, and even the previously dismissed idea of cracking using renewable energy is being taken seriously.

Many aspects of this work are putting pressure on long-term value for the chemicals sector, including:

  • Increased demand from governments, regulators, investors and the public to support net-zero commitments and decarbonization more quickly than previously considered.
  • Investor uncertainty about future growth in the context of a changing and increasingly volatile business environment, which can now be described as “BANI”⁷ – brittle, anxious, nonlinear and incomprehensible.
  • The changing future of the global energy system, which is the primary feedstock supplier to the chemicals industry. Many thought leaders are wary of the future role of carbon-intensive sectors, advocating for complete removal of fossil fuels from the global energy system and a rapid transition to lower-carbon energy sources. This move would probably bring increased volatility and higher pricing to basic chemicals feedstocks.

It’s our view that decarbonization strategies must move toward the top of the agenda in the chemicals sector, which has both direct and enabling roles to play in this race to net zero:

  • Radically reduce the “footprint” of chemicals industry operations.

Building on strategic objectives, define an optimization framework across your organization to evaluate the cost/benefit case for different operational adjustments that will drive a reduction in GHG emissions. Many leading companies have been doing this for decades; one chemical company reports that it added $4 billion to its bottom line through energy efficiency improvements during a single decade. And there is still more to be done: new technology developments mean that opportunities that were previously judged not worthy of investment should be reconsidered. The proven EY decarbonization methodology has helped several large companies develop plans for profitable footprint reductions.

  • Improve the “handprint” benefits of the products of chemistry.

Implement a supply chain approach that identifies emission hotspots in your supply chain, providing a platform for engagement. Then consider collaboration opportunities with value chain partners to develop ways to improve impacts at the point of greatest leverage. Revenue improvements and cost savings from more sustainable products have proved to be an important source of economic profit.

  • Take the lead in developing a blueprint of industry practices, public policy and cultural changes that will be needed to get to net zero.

The voice of progressive industry is increasingly needed in today’s policy discussions. Policymakers and advisors recognize that a profitable and progressive chemicals sector will be key to successful change. And progressive practices, such as valuing ecosystem services and the role of nature in solving engineering challenges, have been shown to provide hundreds of millions of dollars in additional value in the chemical industry.

By Mark Weick, Matt Handford & Sue Tame

Read the full article at https://www.ey.com/en_us/chemicals/how-can-net-zero-in-chemicals-be-profitable.

Tags: ChemicalsNet zero

Related Posts

How financial institutions can win the battle for trust
Industry

How financial institutions can win the battle for trust

Five steps to get industries on track for net zero
Environment

Five steps to get industries on track for net zero

Global m&a industry trends: 2022 mid-year update
Industry

Global M&A industry trends: 2022 mid-year update

Zero-based transformation: the big reset
Industry

Zero-based transformation: The big reset

How has covid-19 reshaped the way americans want to work?
Industry

How has COVID-19 reshaped the way Americans want to work?

How to make blockchain and nfts work for your company
Industry

How to make blockchain and NFTs work for your company

As e-mobility accelerates, can utilities move evs into the fast lane?
Industry

As e-mobility accelerates, can utilities move EVs into the fast lane?

The 10 us cities seeing the most price cuts for homes
Industry

The 10 US cities seeing the most price cuts for homes

Is inflation pushing consumers to the edge?
Industry

Is inflation pushing consumers to the edge?

Us health care can’t afford health inequities
Health

US health care can’t afford health inequities

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Closing the vaccine gap / WHO
  • Beyond “agree to disagree”: why leaders need to foster a culture of productive disagreement and debate
  • Apple reportedly plans to put ads in more iPhone apps
  • Oil drops as China’s growth slows, prompting surprise rate cut
  • Dan Loeb’s Third Point takes new stake in Disney

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Categories

    • Art & Culture
    • Business
    • CEO Interviews
    • CEO Life
    • Editor´s Choice
    • Entrepreneur
    • Environment
    • Food
    • Health
    • Highlights
    • Industry
    • Innovation
    • Issues
    • Management & Leadership
    • Multimedia
    • News
    • Opinion
    • PrimeZone
    • Printed Version
    • Travel
    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    CEO Latin America | ES

    • CONTACT
    • GENERAL ENQUIRIES
    • ADVERTISING
    • MEDIA KIT
    • DIRECTORY
    • TERMS AND CONDITIONS

    Editorials – george.hatfield@ceo-na.com
    Editor-in-Chief - paul.imison@ceo-na.com
    Advertising – media@ceo-na.com

    AUSTIN

    600, Congress Avenue
    14th Floor
    Austin, TX.
    78701
    USA
    +1 512 649 0340

    NEW YORK

    110 Wall St.,
    3rd Floor
    New York, NY.
    10005
    USA
    +1 212 432 5800

    CEO Latin America | ES

    • CONTACT
    • GENERAL ENQUIRIES
    • ADVERTISING
    • MEDIA KIT
    • DIRECTORY
    • TERMS AND CONDITIONS

    Editorials –
    george.hatfield@ceo-na.com
    Editor-in-Chief -
    paul.imison@ceo-na.com
    Advertising –
    media@ceo-na.com

    AUSTIN

    600, Congress Avenue
    14th Floor
    Austin, TX.
    78701
    USA
    +1 512 649 0340

    NEW YORK

    110 Wall St.,
    3rd Floor
    New York, NY.
    10005
    USA
    +1 212 432 5800

    CEO North America © 2022 - Sitemap

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • Business
      • Entrepreneur
      • Industry
      • Innovation
      • Management & Leadership
    • CEO Interviews
    • CEO Life
      • Art & Culture
      • Food
      • Health
      • Travel
      • Environment
    • Opinion
    • News
    • Multimedia

    © 2022 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    Are you sure want to unlock this post?
    Unlock left : 0
    Are you sure want to cancel subscription?