Thursday, July 31, 2025
  • Login
CEO North America
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Entrepreneur
    • Industry
    • Innovation
    • Management & Leadership
  • CEO Interviews
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • CEO Life
    • Art & Culture
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Entrepreneur
    • Industry
    • Innovation
    • Management & Leadership
  • CEO Interviews
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • CEO Life
    • Art & Culture
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
CEO North America
No Result
View All Result

CEO North America > Opinion > Issues in the branding US neighborhood

Issues in the branding US neighborhood

in Opinion
Issues in the branding US neighborhood
Share on LinkedinShare on WhatsApp

Despite 40% of respondents in Mexico, Russia and UK have a negative perception of US, American brands are still loved.

J. Walter Thompson presented a new study that analyzes the current situation of the country brand “United States” and how it impacts on US brands and their position on the global stage. The study reveals that while the perception of the country brand has deteriorated considerably in the past year, US brands are still favorably perceived.

Only 15% of the respondents said that the situation of the country of origin of the brands is important for them to be liked. Apple, Coca-Cola, Ford, McDonald’s, Microsoft and Nike are the top American brands mentioned spontaneously.

Despite concerns about the “United States” brand, US brands are widely accepted: 78% in the UK and 93% in China and India; curiously a higher percentage than in the United States where approval is 90%. These figures have changed little since 2012, suggesting that US and foreign consumers clearly distinguish between the country brand “United States” and US brands.

Knowledge about the origin of American brands has been tempered, in part, by alliances with local brands and the “tropicalization” or adaptation of certain products in each country, showing a weakening of the idea that brands have a country of origin.

Some other studies find that Brand America, which mainly analyzes the situation of the country brand “United States”, detects obvious changes in the attitudes towards the country in recent months.

The number of international visitors to the United States during the first quarter of 2017 fell 4.2%, equivalent to 700,000 people, compared to the previous year, according to the latest published figures by the United States Department of Commerce. This drop is equivalent to a loss of $2.7 billion in spending, according to Oxford Economics.

While 64% of respondents expressed confidence that Barack Obama was doing well in international politics during the last year of his presidency, only 22% of respondents have confidence in Donald Trump, according to the survey Global Attitudes of the Pew Research Center, held in 37 countries during the spring of 2017. Many studies have shown that trust is intimately linked to consumer spending.

Tags: Issues in the branding US neighborhoodUS brands

Related Posts

How employers can address future retirement risks
Opinion

How employers can address future retirement risks

Risk of recession drops
Opinion

Hybrid jobs: How AI is rewriting work in finance

Five Questions All Leaders Should Always Be Asking
Opinion

Leadership beyond achievements

The Growth Equation: Avoid Customer-segment Collisions
Opinion

The Growth Equation: Avoid Customer-segment Collisions

U.S. trade gap expands to $74.6B
Opinion

Trade Uncertainty Has a Smaller Impact on the Economy Than Feared

Procurement, Redesigned for Uncertainty
Opinion

Procurement, Redesigned for Uncertainty

What Makes U.S. Multinationals Shift Costs Back Home to Save on Taxes
Opinion

What Makes U.S. Multinationals Shift Costs Back Home to Save on Taxes

Board Effectiveness: How Can You Get to Optimal?
Opinion

Board Effectiveness: How Can You Get to Optimal?

It’s 8 PM, and Yes, You Are Working
Opinion

It’s 8 PM, and Yes, You Are Working

The Remote Work Paradox: Higher Engagement, Lower Wellbeing
Opinion

The Remote Work Paradox: Higher Engagement, Lower Wellbeing

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • How employers can address future retirement risks
  • U.S. to impose 25% tariff on India from Aug 1
  • HSBC reports first-half profit slump of 26%
  • Starbucks CEO says turnaround is ahead of schedule
  • New tool gives anyone the ability to train a robot

Archives

Categories

  • Art & Culture
  • Business
  • CEO Interviews
  • CEO Life
  • Editor´s Choice
  • Entrepreneur
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Highlights
  • Industry
  • Innovation
  • Issues
  • Management & Leadership
  • News
  • Opinion
  • PrimeZone
  • Printed Version
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

  • CONTACT
  • GENERAL ENQUIRIES
  • ADVERTISING
  • MEDIA KIT
  • DIRECTORY
  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Advertising –
advertising@ceo-na.com

110 Wall St.,
3rd Floor
New York, NY.
10005
USA
+1 212 432 5800

Avenida Chapultepec 480,
Floor 11
Mexico City
06700
MEXICO

  • News
  • CEO Interviews
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • CEO Life

  • CONTACT
  • GENERAL ENQUIRIES
  • ADVERTISING
  • MEDIA KIT
  • DIRECTORY
  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Advertising –
advertising@ceo-na.com

110 Wall St.,
3rd Floor
New York, NY.
10005
USA
+1 212 432 5800

Avenida Chapultepec 480,
Floor 11
Mexico City
06700
MEXICO

CEO North America © 2024 - Sitemap

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Entrepreneur
    • Industry
    • Innovation
    • Management & Leadership
  • CEO Interviews
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • CEO Life
    • Art & Culture
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.