Wednesday, April 29, 2026
  • Login
CEO North America
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Entrepreneur
    • Industry
    • Innovation
    • Management & Leadership
  • CEO Interviews
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • CEO Life
    • Art & Culture
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Entrepreneur
    • Industry
    • Innovation
    • Management & Leadership
  • CEO Interviews
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • CEO Life
    • Art & Culture
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
CEO North America
No Result
View All Result

CEO NA Magazine > CEO Life > Environment > When a company’s enviro claims sound convincing …

When a company’s enviro claims sound convincing …

in Environment
When a company’s enviro claims sound convincing …
Share on LinkedinShare on WhatsApp

Greenwashing is when corporations use eco-sustainability as a marketing tool. But can you tell if they’re for real? Here are some ways you can check them out.

Companies tout these certifications. But a 2022 study by the Changing Markets Foundation (CMF) found that the standards set by the majority of the 10 or more popular certification initiatives for the fashion industry aren’t difficult to meet and lack accountability.

Artificial claims about sustainability

Fast fashion relies on cheap synthetic fibers, which are produced from fossil fuels such as oil and gas. And while you might assume that clothing with labels such as “eco” or “sustainable” might have fewer synthetics, you’d unfortunately be wrong.

Another study by CMF found that H&M’s “conscious” clothing range, for example, contained 72% synthetics — which was higher than the percentage in their main collection (61%). And it’s not just H&M. While the same study found that 39% of products made some kind of green claim, almost 60% of these claims did not match the guidelines set out by the UK Competition and Markets Authority.

The same is happening in the meat and dairy industry. Companies say they are reducing their environmental footprint by engaging in “regenerative agriculture”, a farming approach that aims to restore and improve ecosystem health. They argue that it reduces greenhouse gas emissions and helps store carbon in the soil.

But relying on carbon storing in soil is not enough. An article in Nature Communications found that around 135 gigatonnes of stored carbon would be required to offset the emissions that come from the agriculture sector. This is roughly equivalent to the amount of carbon lost due to agriculture over the past 12,000 years, according to CMF.

But companies grab onto these empty promises, perhaps knowing that the general public might only see regenerative agriculture and other “green narratives” as promising.

How can you tell?

1. Be skeptical.

When something has to tell you that it is green, it might not be. Start your investigation right there.

For example, if you were looking at Nestlé’s regenerative agriculture campaign, you would need to find out what regenerative agriculture is and how much it is indeed reducing greenhouse gas emissions. You can do this by starting with a good Google search: e.g “regenerative agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions”.

Once you click on a number of articles that report on this topic, you’ll be able to read about the different studies and data into the topic. Follow the sources used when an article cites a study or data. The article should hyperlink or list the sources. But those hyperlinks might take you to other secondary sources — other articles that cited the same data.

For example, an article might cite this statistic: sustainability certifications increase consumer willingness to pay by approximately 7% on average. The article might cite as the source this study published in the journal Nature. But that article isn’t the original source of that data. It came from a 2014 study published in the Journal of Retailing.

So try to find the primary source and see how credible or reputable it is. Who conducted the research in the first place?

If you wanted to find out what H&M’s “conscious” range really meant, you would start by looking at H&M’s website and reports to look further into their claims. Then, follow those claims.

2. Research the wider industry.

Whether you’re reporting on fashion, agriculture or any other industry, look into where its emissions are coming from, which companies are claiming what and what the evidence says needs to be done in order for these industries to reduce their emissions.

Providing context is important. What percentage of global greenhouse gas emissions is this industry responsible for? Is it getting better or worse? What legislation is in place to reduce emissions from these industries? In order for you and your audience to understand the greenwashing of any company, this background information is vital.

3. Go straight to the company.

Once you’ve conducted some initial research, follow up with the company if you are using it as an example or focus for your article. On Nestlé’s website, for example, you can find contact details for their communications, media or PR department. Send them an email saying something like the following:

“I am writing an article on regenerative agriculture and I’ve found some studies that show that soil sequestration through these practices are in fact not enough to be a real climate solution. Can you please provide me with a comment on what Nestlé thinks about this?”

They might not answer, but that also says a lot. If they don’t reply to you after one or two follow-up emails, you might try calling them.

If you try several times and in different ways to contact them and they failed to respond, you can state that in your article. That way your readers know you made the effort.

Claims from corporations that they are doing all they can to help the planet are easy to make. But if we really want to slow down climate change, significant efforts have to be made. And it is the role of journalists to hold companies to account for the claims they make.

Read through the full article by Amina McCauley / Environment EYES

Related Posts

The stunning underwater world that’s at risk as the Iran war drags on
Environment

The stunning underwater world that’s at risk as the Iran war drags on

There are fixes for AI’s toll on the power grid. Here’s why they’re not happening
Environment

There are fixes for AI’s toll on the power grid. Here’s why they’re not happening

Biden announces offshore wind rights sale in Gulf of Mexico
Environment

France’s Engie discussing refund for US offshore wind projects with Trump administration

Chef José Andrés warns war-driven inflation will cause a larger world hunger problem
Environment

Chef José Andrés warns war-driven inflation will cause a larger world hunger problem

Jet fuel shock from Iran war worsens crisis for global airlines
Environment

Jet fuel shock from Iran war worsens crisis for global airlines

‘The thaw is real’: Indian delegation visits China to talk EVs and more
Environment

‘The thaw is real’: Indian delegation visits China to talk EVs and more

What to know about the 4 people launching to make history around the moon
Environment

What to know about the 4 people launching to make history around the moon

The shift from oil isn’t just about being ‘green’ anymore. It’s a massive power move for national security.
Environment

The shift from oil isn’t just about being ‘green’ anymore. It’s a massive power move for national security.

CEO NA opens the bonnet to understand the latest state of play at Musk’s Tesla
Environment

Tesla Says Semi Battery Is ‘Designed To Last A Million Miles’

White House to pay TotalEnergies $1 billion to kill off East Coast wind farm projects
Environment

White House to pay TotalEnergies $1 billion to kill off East Coast wind farm projects

No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • U.S. trade deficit widens as imports increase
  • Lululemon founder speaks out against new CEO appointment
  • Yum Brands reports solid Q1 driven by Taco Bell sales
  • AI in Family Offices
  • What Gen Z really wants: Rethinking commitment

Archives

Categories

  • Art & Culture
  • Business
  • CEO Interviews
  • CEO Life
  • Editor´s Choice
  • Entrepreneur
  • Environment
  • Food
  • Health
  • Highlights
  • Industry
  • Innovation
  • Issues
  • Management & Leadership
  • News
  • Opinion
  • PrimeZone
  • Printed Version
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

  • CONTACT
  • GENERAL ENQUIRIES
  • ADVERTISING
  • MEDIA KIT
  • DIRECTORY
  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Advertising –
advertising@ceo-na.com

110 Wall St.,
3rd Floor
New York, NY.
10005
USA
+1 212 432 5800

Avenida Chapultepec 480,
Floor 11
Mexico City
06700
MEXICO

  • News
  • CEO Interviews
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • CEO Life

  • CONTACT
  • GENERAL ENQUIRIES
  • ADVERTISING
  • MEDIA KIT
  • DIRECTORY
  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Advertising –
advertising@ceo-na.com

110 Wall St.,
3rd Floor
New York, NY.
10005
USA
+1 212 432 5800

Avenida Chapultepec 480,
Floor 11
Mexico City
06700
MEXICO

CEO North America © 2024 - Sitemap

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • Entrepreneur
    • Industry
    • Innovation
    • Management & Leadership
  • CEO Interviews
  • Opinion
  • Technology
  • Environment
  • CEO Life
    • Art & Culture
    • Food
    • Health
    • Travel

© 2026 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.